Problems of subjectivity in judicial decision-making

Юртимиз тарихида амалга оширилган, Биринчи ва Иккинчи Ренессанс деб ном олган буюк юксалиш даврларида эришилган ноёб илмий-маданий ютуқлар ҳозирги кунда ҳам инсониятни янги марралар сари руҳлантириб келмоқда. Бугунги кунда Янги Ўзбекистон жаҳон ҳамжамияти билан ҳамкорликда Учинчи Ренессанс пойдеворини яратиш йўлидан қатъият билан бормоқда. Биз бу янги Уйғониш даврини илм-фан, инновациялар, замонавий таълим, жамиятнинг маънавий-интеллектуал ўсиши, бой тарихий меросимизга чуқур ҳурмат ва ҳар бир инсоннинг бунёдкорлик салоҳиятини рўёбга чиқаришга асосланган янги тараққиёт босқичи сифатида кўрамиз. Ўзбекистон Республикаси Президенти Шавкат Мирзиёев

Abstract

 Based on fundamental and empirical analysis, this article examines the factors influencing the law enforcement process, professional culture, and the manifestation of personal judgment errors in the administration of justice

Keywords

internal conviction, discretionary power, cognitive bias, professional deformation, justice, precedent, prosecutorial bias


Author Biography

Nishanov S.Yu.

Investigating judge of the Shaykhantohur district criminal court, Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in psychology, Independent researcher at the Institute of Legislation and Legal Policy under the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan


References

  1. O‘zbekiston Respublikasining Konstitutsiyasi. – Toshkent: O‘zbekiston, 2023. – 80 b.
  2. Mirziyoyev Sh.M. Yangi O‘zbekiston taraqqiyot strategiyasi. – Toshkent: Tasvir, 2023. – 416 b.
  3. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Oliy sudi Plenumining 2014-yil 23-maydagi "Sud hukmi to‘g‘risida"gi 07-sonli Qarori // O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Oliy sudi Plenumi qarorlari to‘plami. – Toshkent, 2014.
  4. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi JK. https://www.lex.uz/acts/111453
  5. Islomov Z.M. Davlat va huquq nazariyasi. – Toshkent: Adolat, 2007. – 916 b.
  6. Mirzayev D.M. Sudya kasbiy madaniyati va etikasining ijtimoiy-huquqiy jihatlari // Odil sudlov. – Toshkent, 2021. – №4. – B. 12-18.
  7. Odilqoriyev X.T. Davlat va huquq nazariyasi: Darslik. – Toshkent: Sharq, 2009. – 560 b.
  8. Xojiyev Sh.T. Sud tizimini raqamlashtirish sharoitida odil sudlovni amalga oshirishning tashkiliy-huquqiy masalalari: Yurid. fan. nomz. ... diss. – Toshkent, 2024. – 154 b.
  9. Алексеев С.С. Право: азбука – теория – философия: Опыт комплексного исследования. – М.: Статут, 1999. – 712 с.
  10. Лазарев В.В. Применение права и правосознание судей // Советское государство и право. – Москва, 1971. – №8. – С. 34-41.
  11. Подольская Н.А. Профессиональная деформация правосознания судей и пути ее преодоления // Юридическая психология. – М., 2015. – №2. – С. 22-27.
  12. Dworkin R. Taking Rights Seriously. – Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1977. – 293 p.
  13. Frank J. Law and the Modern Mind. – New York: Brentano’s, 1930. – 362 p.
  14. Guthrie C., Rachlinski J.J., Wistrich A.J. Inside the Judicial Mind // Cornell Law Review. – 2001. – Vol. 86, Issue 4. – P. 777-830.
  15. Hart H.L.A. The Concept of Law. – Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1961. – 273 p.
  16. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases // Science. – 1974. – Vol. 185. – P. 1124-1131.
  17. Holmes O.W. The Path of the Law // Harvard Law Review. – 1897. – Vol. 10, No. 8. – P. 457-478.
  18. Llewellyn K.N. The Bramble Bush: On Our Law and Its Study. – New York: Oceana Publications, 1951. – 168 p.
  19. Posner R.A. How Judges Think. – Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2008. – 400 p.
  20. Simon H.A. Models of Bounded Rationality. – Cambridge: MIT Press, 1982. – 478 p.
  21. Danziger S., Levav J., Avnaim-Pesso L. Extraneous Factors in Judicial Decisions // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. – 2011. – Vol. 108, No. 17. – P. 6889-6892.
  22. Englich B., Mussweiler T., Strack F. Playing Dice with Criminal Sentences: The Influence of Irrelevant Anchors on Experts’ Judicial Decision Making // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. – 2006. – Vol. 32, No. 2. – P. 188-200.
  23. Kahneman D., Sibony O., Sunstein C.R. Noise: A Flaw in Human Judgment. – New York: Little, Brown Spark, 2021. – 464 p.
  24. Ashworth A. Sentencing and Criminal Justice. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. – 546 p.
  25. Sentencing Council for England and Wales. General Guideline: Overarching Principles. – London, 2019. – 12 p.
  26. Ратинов А.Р. Структура правосознания и некоторые методы его исследования // Методология и методы социальной психологии. – М.: Наука, 1977. – С. 201-214.
  27. The Bangalore Principles of Judicial Conduct. – UN ECOSOC Resolution 2006/23. – Vienna: UNODC, 2006. – 12 p.
  28. O‘zbekiston Respublikasining “Sudlar to‘g‘risida”gi Konstitutsiyaviy qonuni. – Toshkent: Adolat, 2021.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 21

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.